日前,Phoronix網站對三種流行的Linux發行版Ubuntu 8.04、Fedora 9和Mandriva 2008.1運用上周推出的Phoronix Test Suite 1.0進行了28項性能對比測試。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ed16/2ed165c8e419302e508e5f7ff91f783a804c289e" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖一)"
測試的硬件平台包括:雙AMD Opteron 2356 4核處理器,ATI FireGL V8600 1GB顯卡,Tyan Thunder n3600M主板,4GB DDR2內存,西數160GB SATA 2.0硬盤和Cooler Master Real Power Pro 1000瓦電源。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24853/248535809e4b135990872bdf3e61b888b778c6e1" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖二)"
所有三款操作系統均為默認設置,Ubuntu 8.04同Mandriva 2008.1一樣均采用Linux 2.6.24內核、X Server 1.4.0.90、GCC 4.2.3,Fedora 9的軟件更新,采用Linux 2.6.25內核、X Server 1.4.99.901、GCC 4.3.0。由於Fedora 9不能與最新的ATI fglrx驅動相兼容,因此所有的測試都采用普通的VESA驅動程序。另外由於Mandriva上的bug,某些測試僅在Ubuntu同Fedora間展開。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b1d1/3b1d1578d4c2b59ea1af2c3a328f8600f28e1068" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖三)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8283/b8283839670f830a8cdd00a8a4e514b4f057f0bb" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖四)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3908/d3908a894e67ef314ed99c007253498149e0b220" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖五)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0cae/c0cae1bff60afbb24f4157fbdf51884550e162b4" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖六)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8dfd8/8dfd897ae424f5459a6b599ab1686bfc8a7a75d4" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖七)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8694e/8694ea6a5787d2ff49f2827b7e6bc5e9b69d7894" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖八)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbe1b/cbe1b8f2bf1ed10bcb6a54c5487bab5242e80db9" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖九)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0cae/c0cae1bff60afbb24f4157fbdf51884550e162b4" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖十)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40220/40220cf54dabc941dc0e0c5c8d13ba994084e108" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖十一)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16216/1621608fa68d395c1424beffd4f3b0fb43813a52" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖十二)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b42b/1b42b39c6b0fc2ee9fda6094d2420cfc07185b9c" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖十三)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17920/179204a2f87efce1f06ec65fe4734eef7817d854" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖十四)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/473bf/473bfeb106429009bba55e7dee7f1cf17d48924a" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖十五)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afe4f/afe4f50a7719901bb87312614c4fe5e1788a5578" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖十六)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60bfb/60bfb8408ee146cedb0d86f247cedb651d749e8a" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖十七)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fc24/8fc24af0f9cd4df4c35372fa5932297348ae8236" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖十八)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01d2a/01d2a672a66a448ca56360ca4cbae67532898286" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖十九)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c3f5/8c3f5184bbdf911ff668e55239784b80066773a4" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖二十)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/546f4/546f43400aed64e84485d9bf00dbdc419e002cf8" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖二十一)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ea3f/2ea3f6bbbd7860936474158154717c208f1532e9" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖二十二)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5eabb/5eabb4a71b1d544bda0dfb2ef8ada8b3e3ca89b4" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖二十三)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cc4d/4cc4df5d52c9299f1b3b459cea57d0720dd69b85" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖二十四)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b28bd/b28bd22d00a95c2a0ac377fc2c6375efd4fa4264" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖二十五)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3eca5/3eca58d81c39ceaaff1f5bddeeec92fd6f78231d" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖二十六)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cff75/cff757b006dee6f04ef25e5b63981ec05ff2eabb" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖二十七)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6306d/6306d5f6791d4118acc3cd85e98cd29cbd63d523" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖二十八)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db949/db949977ae2e75fb80669f08cd0388fc5fa81891" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖二十九)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f2f4/9f2f4b57333eb2aaa7e28adb0b13771219cdd07a" alt="Ubuntu Fedora Mandriva性能對比(圖三十)"
在所有28項測試中,Ubuntu 8.04獲得14項勝利,Mandriva 2008.1在進行的9項測試中有3項取勝,這3項都是SciMark 2.0內基於Java的測試。另外,在19項僅在Ubuntu和Fedora展開的測試中,Fedora有10項領先。在大多數測試中,這幾個發行版得分都相當接近,如果性能是您在這幾個Linux發行版中選擇的主要因素,您還要根據具體需求來挑選最優的版本